↓ Skip to main content

Prion Protein Modulates Cellular Iron Uptake: A Novel Function with Implications for Prion Disease Pathogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prion Protein Modulates Cellular Iron Uptake: A Novel Function with Implications for Prion Disease Pathogenesis
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay Singh, Maradumane L. Mohan, Alfred Orina Isaac, Xiu Luo, Jiri Petrak, Daniel Vyoral, Neena Singh

Abstract

Converging evidence leaves little doubt that a change in the conformation of prion protein (PrP(C)) from a mainly alpha-helical to a beta-sheet rich PrP-scrapie (PrP(Sc)) form is the main event responsible for prion disease associated neurotoxicity. However, neither the mechanism of toxicity by PrP(Sc), nor the normal function of PrP(C) is entirely clear. Recent reports suggest that imbalance of iron homeostasis is a common feature of prion infected cells and mouse models, implicating redox-iron in prion disease pathogenesis. In this report, we provide evidence that PrP(C) mediates cellular iron uptake and transport, and mutant PrP forms alter cellular iron levels differentially. Using human neuroblastoma cells as models, we demonstrate that over-expression of PrP(C) increases intra-cellular iron relative to non-transfected controls as indicated by an increase in total cellular iron, the cellular labile iron pool (LIP), and iron content of ferritin. As a result, the levels of iron uptake proteins transferrin (Tf) and transferrin receptor (TfR) are decreased, and expression of iron storage protein ferritin is increased. The positive effect of PrP(C) on ferritin iron content is enhanced by stimulating PrP(C) endocytosis, and reversed by cross-linking PrP(C) on the plasma membrane. Expression of mutant PrP forms lacking the octapeptide-repeats, the membrane anchor, or carrying the pathogenic mutation PrP(102L) decreases ferritin iron content significantly relative to PrP(C) expressing cells, but the effect on cellular LIP and levels of Tf, TfR, and ferritin is complex, varying with the mutation. Neither PrP(C) nor the mutant PrP forms influence the rate or amount of iron released into the medium, suggesting a functional role for PrP(C) in cellular iron uptake and transport to ferritin, and dysfunction of PrP(C) as a significant contributing factor of brain iron imbalance in prion disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 11 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Chemistry 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2009.
All research outputs
#5,576,537
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#67,761
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,631
of 171,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#237
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.