↓ Skip to main content

OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
525 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sridhar Ranganathan, Patrick F. Suthers, Costas D. Maranas

Abstract

Computational procedures for predicting metabolic interventions leading to the overproduction of biochemicals in microbial strains are widely in use. However, these methods rely on surrogate biological objectives (e.g., maximize growth rate or minimize metabolic adjustments) and do not make use of flux measurements often available for the wild-type strain. In this work, we introduce the OptForce procedure that identifies all possible engineering interventions by classifying reactions in the metabolic model depending upon whether their flux values must increase, decrease or become equal to zero to meet a pre-specified overproduction target. We hierarchically apply this classification rule for pairs, triples, quadruples, etc. of reactions. This leads to the identification of a sufficient and non-redundant set of fluxes that must change (i.e., MUST set) to meet a pre-specified overproduction target. Starting with this set we subsequently extract a minimal set of fluxes that must actively be forced through genetic manipulations (i.e., FORCE set) to ensure that all fluxes in the network are consistent with the overproduction objective. We demonstrate our OptForce framework for succinate production in Escherichia coli using the most recent in silico E. coli model, iAF1260. The method not only recapitulates existing engineering strategies but also reveals non-intuitive ones that boost succinate production by performing coordinated changes on pathways distant from the last steps of succinate synthesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 487 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 26%
Researcher 106 20%
Student > Master 76 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 66 13%
Unknown 68 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 169 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 98 19%
Engineering 68 13%
Chemical Engineering 35 7%
Computer Science 33 6%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 89 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,376,482
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,124
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,680
of 102,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.