↓ Skip to main content

Brazilian practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: Part II

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brazilian practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: Part II
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, September 2022
DOI 10.1055/s-0042-1757692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cesar Minelli, Gustavo José Luvizutto, Roberta de Oliveira Cacho, Luciana de Oliveira Neves, Sheila Cristina Sayuri Abe Magalhães, Marco Túlio Araújo Pedatella, Lucia Iracema Zanotto de Mendonça, Karin Zazo Ortiz, Marcos Christiano Lange, Priscila Watson Ribeiro, Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza, Cristiano Milani, Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz, Rafael Dalle Molle da Costa, Adriana Bastos Conforto, Fernanda Martins Maia Carvalho, Bruna Silva Ciarlini, Norberto Anizio Ferreira Frota, Kelson James Almeida, Eliane Schochat, Tatiana de Paula Oliveira, Camila Miranda, Maria Elisa Pimentel Piemonte, Laura Cardia Gomes Lopes, Camila Galvão Lopes, Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira Tosin, Bianca Campos Oliveira, Beatriz Guitton Renaud Baptista de Oliveira, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, João Brainier Clares de Andrade, Gisele Sampaio Silva, Octávio Marques Pontes-Neto, João José Freitas de Carvalho, Sheila C. Ouriques Martins, Rodrigo Bazan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 51 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Unspecified 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 54 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,058,529
of 24,703,227 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#242
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,008
of 429,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,703,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.