You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disturbance indicator values for European plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Ecology & Biogeography, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/geb.13603 |
| Authors |
Gabriele Midolo, Tomáš Herben, Irena Axmanová, Corrado Marcenò, Ricarda Pätsch, Helge Bruelheide, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Svetlana Aćić, Ariel Bergamini, Erwin Bergmeier, Idoia Biurrun, Gianmaria Bonari, Andraž Čarni, Alessandro Chiarucci, Michele De Sanctis, Olga Demina, Jürgen Dengler, Tetiana Dziuba, Giuliano Fanelli, Emmanuel Garbolino, Gianpietro Giusso del Galdo, Friedemann Goral, Behlül Güler, Guillermo Hinojos‐Mendoza, Florian Jansen, Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro, Attila Lengyel, Jonathan Lenoir, Aaron Pérez‐Haase, Remigiusz Pielech, Vadim Prokhorov, Valerijus Rašomavičius, Eszter Ruprecht, Solvita Rūsiņa, Urban Šilc, Željko Škvorc, Zvjezdana Stančić, Irina Tatarenko, Milan Chytrý |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Belgium | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 45% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,047,021
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#376
of 823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,854
of 444,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them