ANALYSIS OF ‘IMMINENCE’ IN INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CLAIMS: TEITIOTA V NEW ZEALAND AND BEYOND

Overview of attention for article published in International & Comparative Law Quarterly, October 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 637)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 36 X posts from 35 X users, with an upper bound of 115,339 followers.

RT @profjmcadam: My new article with Michelle Foster @McMullin_Centre is out now - a critique of the UN Human Rights Committee's reluctance…

RT @profjmcadam: My new article with Michelle Foster @McMullin_Centre is out now - a critique of the UN Human Rights Committee's reluctance…

Teitiota Ada ülkesini su basması nedeniyle adadan yapılan iltica başvurularını Yeni Zelanda’nın reddetmesini Sözleşmeye uygun bulan İnsan Hakları Komitesi kararı üzerine #yaşamhakkı #gerigöndermeyasağı #işkenceyasağı #iltica #iklimkrizi

RT @profjmcadam: My new article with Michelle Foster @McMullin_Centre is out now - a critique of the UN Human Rights Committee's reluctance…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 32 additional X posts.