↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Immunity in a Nationally Representative Population following the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors and Immunity in a Nationally Representative Population following the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don Bandaranayake, Q. Sue Huang, Ange Bissielo, Tim Wood, Graham Mackereth, Michael G. Baker, Richard Beasley, Stewart Reid, Sally Roberts, Virginia Hope

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Vietnam 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 85 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Mathematics 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,356,196
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,398
of 208,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,447
of 102,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#91
of 883 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 883 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.