You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The discovery of endogenous retroviruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Retrovirology, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4690-3-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin A Weiss |
| Abstract |
When endogenous retroviruses (ERV) were discovered in the late 1960s, the Mendelian inheritance of retroviral genomes by their hosts was an entirely new concept. Indeed Howard M Temin's DNA provirus hypothesis enunciated in 1964 was not generally accepted, and reverse transcriptase was yet to be discovered. Nonetheless, the evidence that we accrued in the pre-molecular era has stood the test of time, and our hypothesis on ERV, which one reviewer described as 'impossible', proved to be correct. Here I recount some of the key observations in birds and mammals that led to the discovery of ERV, and comment on their evolution, cross-species dispersion, and what remains to be elucidated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 451 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 18% |
| Researcher | 68 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 193 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 95 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#603,922
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#13
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#869
of 88,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.