The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/ard-2022-223296 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sofia Ramiro, Elena Nikiphorou, Alexandre Sepriano, Augusta Ortolan, Casper Webers, Xenofon Baraliakos, Robert B M Landewé, Filip E Van den Bosch, Boryana Boteva, Ann Bremander, Philippe Carron, Adrian Ciurea, Floris A van Gaalen, Pál Géher, Lianne Gensler, Josef Hermann, Manouk de Hooge, Marketa Husakova, Uta Kiltz, Clementina López-Medina, Pedro M Machado, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Anna Molto, Victoria Navarro-Compán, Michael J Nissen, Fernando M Pimentel-Santos, Denis Poddubnyy, Fabian Proft, Martin Rudwaleit, Mark Telkman, Sizheng Steven Zhao, Nelly Ziade, Désirée van der Heijde |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Colombia | 3 | 1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 161 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 14% |
| Scientists | 26 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 18% |
| Unknown | 153 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 166 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#171,252
of 26,368,738 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#62
of 7,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,926
of 449,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.