You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilisation of specialist sonographers for head and neck ultrasound fine-needle aspiration cytology can help shorten waiting lists and improve efficiency of the service
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.10.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roma Dave, Simon Roberts, Jasper Bekker, Peter A. Brennan |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 33% |
| Ireland | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,119,990
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
#38
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,041
of 455,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
#4
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.