You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005268.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally-Anne S Duke, Stephen Colagiuri, Ruth Colagiuri |
| Abstract |
Type 2 diabetes is a common and costly chronic disease which is associated with significant premature mortality and morbidity. Although patient education is an integral component of diabetes care, there remain uncertainties regarding the effectiveness of different methods and modes of education. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 553 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 13% |
| Researcher | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 123 | 21% |
| Unknown | 108 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 234 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 7% |
| Psychology | 25 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 11% |
| Unknown | 124 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,449,655
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,097
of 12,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,019
of 170,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.