You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rich Pickings Near Large Communal Roosts Favor ‘Gang’ Foraging by Juvenile Common Ravens, Corvus corax
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sasha R. X. Dall, Jonathan Wright |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2009.
All research outputs
#2,915,805
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,873
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,606
of 113,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#116
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.