You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Review of harmful algal bloom effects on birds with implications for avian wildlife in the Chesapeake Bay region
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harmful Algae, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102319 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barnett A Rattner, Catherine E Wazniak, Julia S Lankton, Peter C McGowan, Serguei V Drovetski, Todd A Egerton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,243,416
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Harmful Algae
#161
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,107
of 442,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harmful Algae
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.