↓ Skip to main content

Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011913.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jen Sothornwit, Srinaree Kaewrudee, Pisake Lumbiganon, Porjai Pattanittum, Sarah H Averbach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 46 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Unspecified 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 45 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,797,644
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,877
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,302
of 441,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.