↓ Skip to main content

Botulinum toxin for drooling in Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Botulinum toxin for drooling in Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012408
Authors

Fiona Hill, Nick Miller, Richard A Walsh, David Mockler, Ronald McDowell, Margaret Walshe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,759,512
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,780
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,687
of 329,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.