↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in non-pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in non-pregnant women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Albert, Isabel Huertas, Inmaculado Pereiro, José Sanfélix, Victoria Gosalbes, Carla Perrotta

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common health care problem. Recurrent UTI (RUTI) in healthy non-pregnant women is defined as three or more episodes of UTI during a twelve month period. Long-term antibiotics have been proposed as a prevention strategy for RUTI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 17%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 25 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#930,416
of 14,468,718 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,772
of 10,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,483
of 150,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,468,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.