↓ Skip to main content

From Offshore to Onshore: Multiple Origins of Shallow-Water Corals from Deep-Sea Ancestors

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Offshore to Onshore: Multiple Origins of Shallow-Water Corals from Deep-Sea Ancestors
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Lindner, Stephen D. Cairns, Clifford W. Cunningham

Abstract

Shallow-water tropical reefs and the deep sea represent the two most diverse marine environments. Understanding the origin and diversification of this biodiversity is a major quest in ecology and evolution. The most prominent and well-supported explanation, articulated since the first explorations of the deep sea, holds that benthic marine fauna originated in shallow, onshore environments, and diversified into deeper waters. In contrast, evidence that groups of marine organisms originated in the deep sea is limited, and the possibility that deep-water taxa have contributed to the formation of shallow-water communities remains untested with phylogenetic methods. Here we show that stylasterid corals (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Stylasteridae)--the second most diverse group of hard corals--originated and diversified extensively in the deep sea, and subsequently invaded shallow waters. Our phylogenetic results show that deep-water stylasterid corals have invaded the shallow-water tropics three times, with one additional invasion of the shallow-water temperate zone. Our results also show that anti-predatory innovations arose in the deep sea, but were not involved in the shallow-water invasions. These findings are the first robust evidence that an important group of tropical shallow-water marine animals evolved from deep-water ancestors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 10 4%
Germany 4 2%
Argentina 4 2%
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Mexico 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 227 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 27 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 59%
Environmental Science 33 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 33 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,290,422
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,527
of 208,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,100
of 85,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#90
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.