You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Impact on Cost-Effectiveness of Accounting for Generic Drug Pricing: Four Case Studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua T. Cohen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 38% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 76% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,162,828
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#98
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,138
of 411,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.