The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 324 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2022 EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in adults with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/ard-2022-223335 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George E Fragoulis, Elena Nikiphorou, Mrinalini Dey, Sizheng Steven Zhao, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, Laurent Arnaud, Fabiola Atzeni, Georg MN Behrens, Johannes WJ Bijlsma, Peter Böhm, Costas A Constantinou, Silvia Garcia-Diaz, Meliha Crnkic Kapetanovic, Kim Lauper, Mariana Luís, Jacques Morel, György Nagy, Eva Polverino, Jef van Rompay, Marco Sebastiani, Anja Strangfeld, Annette de Thurah, James Galloway, Kimme L Hyrich |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 4% |
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 261 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 243 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 47 | 15% |
| Scientists | 26 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 46% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 276. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#136,905
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#47
of 7,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,901
of 446,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.