↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of homocysteinemia and effect of vitamin supplementation in retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of homocysteinemia and effect of vitamin supplementation in retinal vein occlusion
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, November 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001139
Authors

Maxwell Levi, Amro A Harb, Andrew Trippiedi, Sophia Rodriguez, Nicholas Vianna, Lisa M Higgins, Lauren Kallina, Lee Angioletti, Justin Gutman, Patrick M Higgins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,955,641
of 22,462,458 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#131
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,147
of 267,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,462,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.