You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Underestimation of Species Richness in Neotropical Frogs Revealed by mtDNA Analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Fouquet, André Gilles, Miguel Vences, Christian Marty, Michel Blanc, Neil J. Gemmell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 31 | 5% |
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 515 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 14% |
| Researcher | 83 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 8% |
| Other | 131 | 22% |
| Unknown | 70 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 396 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Unknown | 85 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,751,799
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,178
of 193,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,518
of 76,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#81
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.