↓ Skip to main content

How Noisy Adaptation of Neurons Shapes Interspike Interval Histograms and Correlations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Noisy Adaptation of Neurons Shapes Interspike Interval Histograms and Correlations
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tilo Schwalger, Karin Fisch, Jan Benda, Benjamin Lindner

Abstract

Channel noise is the dominant intrinsic noise source of neurons causing variability in the timing of action potentials and interspike intervals (ISI). Slow adaptation currents are observed in many cells and strongly shape response properties of neurons. These currents are mediated by finite populations of ionic channels and may thus carry a substantial noise component. Here we study the effect of such adaptation noise on the ISI statistics of an integrate-and-fire model neuron by means of analytical techniques and extensive numerical simulations. We contrast this stochastic adaptation with the commonly studied case of a fast fluctuating current noise and a deterministic adaptation current (corresponding to an infinite population of adaptation channels). We derive analytical approximations for the ISI density and ISI serial correlation coefficient for both cases. For fast fluctuations and deterministic adaptation, the ISI density is well approximated by an inverse Gaussian (IG) and the ISI correlations are negative. In marked contrast, for stochastic adaptation, the density is more peaked and has a heavier tail than an IG density and the serial correlations are positive. A numerical study of the mixed case where both fast fluctuations and adaptation channel noise are present reveals a smooth transition between the analytically tractable limiting cases. Our conclusions are furthermore supported by numerical simulations of a biophysically more realistic Hodgkin-Huxley type model. Our results could be used to infer the dominant source of noise in neurons from their ISI statistics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 5%
United States 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor 9 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 32%
Neuroscience 29 24%
Physics and Astronomy 15 13%
Engineering 7 6%
Computer Science 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 11 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2010.
All research outputs
#6,470,045
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,361
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,986
of 192,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#20
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.