The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association of lipid-lowering drugs and antidiabetic drugs with age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis in Europeans
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.1136/bjo-2022-321985 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthias M Mauschitz, Timo Verzijden, Alexander K Schuster, Hisham Elbaz, Norbert Pfeiffer, Anthony Khawaja, Robert N Luben, Paul J Foster, Franziska G Rauscher, Kerstin Wirkner, Toralf Kirsten, Jost B Jonas, Mukharram M Bikbov, Ruth Hogg, Tunde Peto, Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire, Geir Bertelsen, Maja Gran Erke, Fotis Topouzis, Dimitrios A Giannoulis, Caroline Brandl, Iris M Heid, Catherine P Creuzot-Garcher, Pierre-Henry Gabrielle, Hans-Werner Hense, Daniel Pauleikhoff, Patricia Barreto, Rita Coimbra, Stefano Piermarocchi, Vincent Daien, Frank G Holz, Cecile Delcourt, Robert P Finger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 16% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 30% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 60% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#55,479
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#17
of 6,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,553
of 449,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.