You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analgesic benefits of single-shot versus continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2022-103756 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nasir Hussain, Richard Brull, Steven Zhou, Robert Schroell, Colin McCartney, Tamara Sawyer, Faraj Abdallah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 30% |
| Canada | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Philippines | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,311,857
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#133
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,415
of 435,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.