↓ Skip to main content

Physics with the KLOE-2 experiment at the upgraded DAΦNE

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physics with the KLOE-2 experiment at the upgraded DAΦNE
Published in
European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, June 2010
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1351-1
Authors

G. Amelino-Camelia, F. Archilli, D. Babusci, D. Badoni, G. Bencivenni, J. Bernabeu, R. A. Bertlmann, D. R. Boito, C. Bini, C. Bloise, V. Bocci, F. Bossi, P. Branchini, A. Budano, S. A. Bulychjev, P. Campana, G. Capon, F. Ceradini, P. Ciambrone, E. Czerwinski, H. Czyz, G. D’Ambrosio, E. Dané, E. De Lucia, G. De Robertis, A. De Santis, P. De Simone, G. De Zorzi, A. Di Domenico, C. Di Donato, B. Di Micco, D. Domenici, S. I. Eidelman, O. Erriquez, R. Escribano, R. Essig, G. V. Fedotovich, G. Felici, S. Fiore, P. Franzini, P. Gauzzi, F. Giacosa, S. Giovannella, F. Gonnella, E. Graziani, F. Happacher, B. C. Hiesmayr, B. Höistad, E. Iarocci, S. Ivashyn, M. Jacewicz, F. Jegerlehner, T. Johansson, J. Lee-Franzini, W. Kluge, V. V. Kulikov, A. Kupsc, R. Lehnert, F. Loddo, P. Lukin, M. A. Martemianov, M. Martini, M. A. Matsyuk, N. E. Mavromatos, F. Mescia, R. Messi, S. Miscetti, G. Morello, D. Moricciani, P. Moskal, S. Müller, F. Nguyen, E. Passemar, M. Passera, A. Passeri, V. Patera, M. R. Pennington, J. Prades, L. Quintieri, A. Ranieri, M. Reece, P. Santangelo, S. Sarkar, I. Sarra, M. Schioppa, P. C. Schuster, B. Sciascia, A. Sciubba, M. Silarski, C. Taccini, N. Toro, L. Tortora, G. Venanzoni, R. Versaci, L.-T. Wang, W. Wislicki, M. Wolke, J. Zdebik

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 4 13%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Professor 2 7%
Librarian 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 23 77%
Energy 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2010.
All research outputs
#1,875,052
of 12,371,789 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#132
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,295
of 146,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,371,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.