You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.11.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roderick P. Venekamp, Ewoud Schuit, Lotty Hooft, Irene K. Veldhuijzen, Wouter van den Bijllaardt, Suzan D. Pas, Vivian F. Zwart, Esther B. Lodder, Marloes Hellwich, Marco Koppelman, Richard Molenkamp, Constantijn J.H. Wijers, Irene H. Vroom, Leonard C. Smeets, Carla R.S. Nagel-Imming, Wanda G.H. Han, Susan van den Hof, Jan A.J.W. Kluytmans, Janneke H.H.M. van de Wijgert, Karel G.M. Moons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 668 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 113 | 17% |
| France | 39 | 6% |
| Canada | 25 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 3% |
| Australia | 19 | 3% |
| Germany | 10 | 1% |
| Comoros | 7 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 51 | 8% |
| Unknown | 370 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 589 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 5% |
| Scientists | 33 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 487. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#52,581
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#17
of 4,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,470
of 411,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.