The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013534.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maeve M Kelleher, Rachel Phillips, Sara J Brown, Suzie Cro, Victoria Cornelius, Karin C Lødrup Carlsen, Håvard O Skjerven, Eva M Rehbinder, Adrian J Lowe, Eishika Dissanayake, Naoki Shimojo, Kaori Yonezawa, Yukihiro Ohya, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Kumiko Morita, Emma Axon, Michael Cork, Alison Cooke, Eleanor Van Vogt, Jochen Schmitt, Stephan Weidinger, Danielle McClanahan, Eric Simpson, Lelia Duley, Lisa M Askie, Hywel C Williams, Robert J Boyle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 27 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 83 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#796,906
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,407
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,451
of 437,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.