↓ Skip to main content

Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Review, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 567)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
68 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts and management of feral cats Felis catus in Australia
Published in
Mammal Review, November 2016
DOI 10.1111/mam.12080
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Chris R. Dickman, Chris N. Johnson, Sarah M. Legge, Euan G. Ritchie, John C. Z. Woinarski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 293 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 15%
Student > Master 39 13%
Researcher 37 12%
Other 17 6%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 82 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 30%
Environmental Science 74 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 3%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 90 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#266,940
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Review
#22
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,324
of 417,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them