↓ Skip to main content

Risk for Asthma in Offspring of Asthmatic Mothers versus Fathers: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk for Asthma in Offspring of Asthmatic Mothers versus Fathers: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H. Lim, Lester Kobzik, Morten Dahl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 50 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 54 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,634,662
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,022
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,698
of 105,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#136
of 739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.