↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia
Published in
Clinics, January 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(sup01)06
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alaa J Hamada, Sandro C Esteves, Ashok Agarwal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 43 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,270,134
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#577
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,481
of 280,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#24
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.