↓ Skip to main content

Orally Administered P22 Phage Tailspike Protein Reduces Salmonella Colonization in Chickens: Prospects of a Novel Therapy against Bacterial Infections

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orally Administered P22 Phage Tailspike Protein Reduces Salmonella Colonization in Chickens: Prospects of a Novel Therapy against Bacterial Infections
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013904
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shakeeba Waseh, Pejman Hanifi-Moghaddam, Russell Coleman, Michael Masotti, Shannon Ryan, Mary Foss, Roger MacKenzie, Matthew Henry, Christine M. Szymanski, Jamshid Tanha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,935,499
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,051
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,278
of 192,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#206
of 1,065 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,065 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.