↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Prediction of SH2 Domain Targets Using Structural Information and the FoldX Algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Prediction of SH2 Domain Targets Using Structural Information and the FoldX Algorithm
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio E. Sánchez, Pedro Beltrao, Francois Stricher, Joost Schymkowitz, Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg, Frederic Rousseau, Luis Serrano

Abstract

Current experiments likely cover only a fraction of all protein-protein interactions. Here, we developed a method to predict SH2-mediated protein-protein interactions using the structure of SH2-phosphopeptide complexes and the FoldX algorithm. We show that our approach performs similarly to experimentally derived consensus sequences and substitution matrices at predicting known in vitro and in vivo targets of SH2 domains. We use our method to provide a set of high-confidence interactions for human SH2 domains with known structure filtered on secondary structure and phosphorylation state. We validated the predictions using literature-derived SH2 interactions and a probabilistic score obtained from a naive Bayes integration of information on coexpression, conservation of the interaction in other species, shared interaction partners, and functions. We show how our predictions lead to a new hypothesis for the role of SH2 domains in signaling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 66 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 18 22%
Professor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Computer Science 7 9%
Chemistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2008.
All research outputs
#6,478,835
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,444
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,567
of 96,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.