The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retinal toxicity in a multinational inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus on hydroxychloroquine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lupus Science & Medicine, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/lupus-2022-000789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celline C Almeida-Brasil, John G Hanly, Murray Urowitz, Ann Elaine Clarke, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Caroline Gordon, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Michelle A Petri, Ellen M Ginzler, Daniel J Wallace, Sang-Cheol Bae, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Mary-Anne Dooley, Christine Peschken, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Susan Manzi, Søren Jacobsen, S Sam Lim, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Ola Nived, Andreas Jönsen, Diane L Kamen, Cynthia Aranow, Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero, Dafna D Gladman, Paul R Fortin, Graciela S Alarcon, Joan T Merrill, Kenneth Kalunian, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Kristjan Steinsson, A Zoma, Anca D Askanase, Munther Khamashta, Ian N Bruce, Murat Inanc, Luck Lukusa, Sasha Bernatsky |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Jordan | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 79 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 80% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 79% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#610,459
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Lupus Science & Medicine
#18
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,511
of 498,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lupus Science & Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.