↓ Skip to main content

High-speed tracking of rupture and clustering in freely falling granular streams

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-speed tracking of rupture and clustering in freely falling granular streams
Published in
Nature, June 2009
DOI 10.1038/nature08115
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Royer, Daniel J. Evans, Loreto Oyarte, Qiti Guo, Eliot Kapit, Matthias E. Möbius, Scott R. Waitukaitis, Heinrich M. Jaeger

Abstract

Thin streams of liquid commonly break up into characteristic droplet patterns owing to the surface-tension-driven Plateau-Rayleigh instability. Very similar patterns are observed when initially uniform streams of dry granular material break up into clusters of grains, even though flows of macroscopic particles are considered to lack surface tension. Recent studies on freely falling granular streams tracked fluctuations in the stream profile, but the clustering mechanism remained unresolved because the full evolution of the instability could not be observed. Here we demonstrate that the cluster formation is driven by minute, nanoNewton cohesive forces that arise from a combination of van der Waals interactions and capillary bridges between nanometre-scale surface asperities. Our experiments involve high-speed video imaging of the granular stream in the co-moving frame, control over the properties of the grain surfaces and the use of atomic force microscopy to measure grain-grain interactions. The cohesive forces that we measure correspond to an equivalent surface tension five orders of magnitude below that of ordinary liquids. We find that the shapes of these weakly cohesive, non-thermal clusters of macroscopic particles closely resemble droplets resulting from thermally induced rupture of liquid nanojets.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
France 3 2%
South Africa 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 167 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 27%
Researcher 50 26%
Student > Master 16 8%
Professor 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 65 33%
Engineering 50 26%
Chemical Engineering 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 29 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,114,841
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#41,931
of 90,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,622
of 113,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#198
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.