↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Common Polymorphism rs11614913 in Hsa-miR-196a2 on Lung Cancer Risk

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Common Polymorphism rs11614913 in Hsa-miR-196a2 on Lung Cancer Risk
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhengrong Yuan, Xu Zeng, Dan Yang, Weilu Wang, Zhihua Liu

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in microRNA-coding genes may participate in the pathogenesis of lung cancer by altering the expression of tumor-related microRNAs. Several studies were investigated in recent years to evaluate the association between hsa-miR-196a2 rs11614913 polymorphism and increased/decreased lung cancer risk. In the present study, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically summarize the possible association.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Sri Lanka 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,190,878
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,039
of 193,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,587
of 198,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,330
of 5,163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.