You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Time perspective as a predictor of smoking status: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Surveys in Scotland, France, Germany, China, and Malaysia
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-346 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Genevieve Sansone, Geoffrey T Fong, Peter A Hall, Romain Guignard, François Beck, Ute Mons, Martina Pötschke-Langer, Hua-Hie Yong, Mary E Thompson, Maizurah Omar, Yuan Jiang |
Abstract |
Prior studies have demonstrated that time perspective-the propensity to consider short-versus long-term consequences of one's actions-is a potentially important predictor of health-related behaviors, including smoking. However, most prior studies have been conducted within single high-income countries. The aim of this study was to examine whether time perspective was associated with the likelihood of being a smoker or non-smoker across five countries that vary in smoking behavior and strength of tobacco control policies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 28 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,383,307
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,487
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,335
of 197,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#200
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.