You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can Power-Law Scaling and Neuronal Avalanches Arise from Stochastic Dynamics?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008982 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Touboul, Alain Destexhe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 216 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 29% |
| Researcher | 67 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 56 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 43 | 17% |
| Engineering | 18 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,181
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,701
of 177,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#550
of 679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.