You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disability, identity and the “expressivist objection”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jme.2002.002634 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S D Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3,045
of 3,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,626
of 60,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.