The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Single motor unit matrix
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Martinez-Valdes, Roger M Enoka, Aleš Holobar, Kevin McGill, Dario Farina, Manuela Besomi, François Hug, Deborah Falla, Richard G Carson, Edward A Clancy, Catherine Disselhorst-Klug, Jaap H van Dieën, Kylie Tucker, Simon Gandevia, Madeleine Lowery, Karen Søgaard, Thor Besier, Roberto Merletti, Matthew C Kiernan, John C Rothwell, Eric Perreault, Paul W Hodges |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 16% |
| Engineering | 5 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,193,906
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#67
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,795
of 504,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.