↓ Skip to main content

Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Single motor unit matrix

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Single motor unit matrix
Published in
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology, November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.jelekin.2022.102726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Martinez-Valdes, Roger M Enoka, Aleš Holobar, Kevin McGill, Dario Farina, Manuela Besomi, François Hug, Deborah Falla, Richard G Carson, Edward A Clancy, Catherine Disselhorst-Klug, Jaap H van Dieën, Kylie Tucker, Simon Gandevia, Madeleine Lowery, Karen Søgaard, Thor Besier, Roberto Merletti, Matthew C Kiernan, John C Rothwell, Eric Perreault, Paul W Hodges

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,082,301
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#65
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,080
of 487,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.