↓ Skip to main content

Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003326
Authors

Ken J Farion, Kelly F Russell, Martin H Osmond, Lisa Hartling, Terry P Klassen, Tamara Durec, Ben Vandermeer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#833,400
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,472
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,068
of 115,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.