↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
467 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Analysis of Administrative Data Finds Endoscopist Quality Measures Associated With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Gastroenterology, September 2010
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Shawn S. Forbes, Lawrence F. Paszat, Refik Saskin, Linda Rabeneck

Abstract

Most quality indicators for colonoscopy measure processes; little is known about their relationship to patient outcomes. We investigated whether characteristics of endoscopists, determined from administrative data, are associated with development of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ecuador 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 141 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,551,319
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#2,200
of 12,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,464
of 109,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.