↓ Skip to main content

Dung Beetles Eat Acorns to Increase Their Ovarian Development and Thermal Tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dung Beetles Eat Acorns to Increase Their Ovarian Development and Thermal Tolerance
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010114
Pubmed ID
Authors

José R. Verdú, José L. Casas, Jorge M. Lobo, Catherine Numa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Colombia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 89 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 59%
Environmental Science 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,868,105
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,359
of 223,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,605
of 103,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#135
of 713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.