You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy and safety of acoziborole in patients with human African trypanosomiasis caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2/3 trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, April 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00660-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victor Kande Betu Kumeso, Wilfried Mutombo Kalonji, Sandra Rembry, Olaf Valverde Mordt, Digas Ngolo Tete, Adeline Prêtre, Sophie Delhomme, Médard Ilunga Wa Kyhi, Mamadou Camara, Julie Catusse, Stefan Schneitter, Morgane Nusbaumer, Erick Mwamba Miaka, Hélène Mahenzi Mbembo, Joseph Makaya Mayawula, Mariame Layba Camara, Félix Akwaso Massa, Lewis Kaninda Badibabi, Augustin Kasongo Bonama, Papy Kavunga Lukula, Sylvain Mutanda Kalonji, Phyll Mariero Philemon, Ricardo Mokilifi Nganyonyi, Hugues Embana Mankiara, André Asuka Akongo Nguba, Vincent Kobo Muanza, Ernest Mulenge Nasandhel, Aimée Fifi Nzeza Bambuwu, Bruno Scherrer, Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft, Antoine Tarral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 400 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 75 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 28 | 7% |
United States | 22 | 6% |
Switzerland | 9 | 2% |
France | 8 | 2% |
Canada | 7 | 2% |
Germany | 7 | 2% |
Argentina | 5 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 1% |
Other | 57 | 14% |
Unknown | 177 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 297 | 74% |
Scientists | 59 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 29 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#12,066
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#76
of 5,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381
of 408,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 91.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.