↓ Skip to main content

Increased Growth and Germination Success in Plants following Hydrogen Sulfide Administration

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased Growth and Germination Success in Plants following Hydrogen Sulfide Administration
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick D. Dooley, Suven P. Nair, Peter D. Ward

Abstract

This study presents a novel way of enhancing plant growth through the use of a non-petroleum based product. We report here that exposing either roots or seeds of multicellular plants to extremely low concentrations of dissolved hydrogen sulfide at any stage of life causes statistically significant increases in biomass including higher fruit yield. Individual cells in treated plants were smaller (~13%) than those of controls. Germination success and seedling size increased in, bean, corn, wheat, and pea seeds while time to germination decreases. These findings indicated an important role of H2S as a signaling molecule that can increase the growth rate of all species yet tested. The increased crop yields reported here has the potential to effect the world's agricultural output.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#1,085,177
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,573
of 193,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,952
of 197,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#330
of 5,147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.