The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minocycline, a microglial inhibitor, reduces ‘honey trap’ risk in human economic exchange
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep01685 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Motoki Watabe, Takahiro A. Kato, Sho Tsuboi, Katsuhiko Ishikawa, Kazuhide Hashiya, Akira Monji, Hideo Utsumi, Shigenobu Kanba |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Japan | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| France | 5 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 215 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 349 | 95% |
| Scientists | 13 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 60 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 29% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 19% |
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 376. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#88,983
of 26,567,854 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,183
of 147,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#500
of 212,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#4
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,567,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.