↓ Skip to main content

A Computational Pipeline for High- Throughput Discovery of cis-Regulatory Noncoding RNA in Prokaryotes

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Computational Pipeline for High- Throughput Discovery of cis-Regulatory Noncoding RNA in Prokaryotes
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zizhen Yao, Jeffrey Barrick, Zasha Weinberg, Shane Neph, Ronald Breaker, Martin Tompa, Walter L Ruzzo

Abstract

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are important functional RNAs that do not code for proteins. We present a highly efficient computational pipeline for discovering cis-regulatory ncRNA motifs de novo. The pipeline differs from previous methods in that it is structure-oriented, does not require a multiple-sequence alignment as input, and is capable of detecting RNA motifs with low sequence conservation. We also integrate RNA motif prediction with RNA homolog search, which improves the quality of the RNA motifs significantly. Here, we report the results of applying this pipeline to Firmicute bacteria. Our top-ranking motifs include most known Firmicute elements found in the RNA family database (Rfam). Comparing our motif models with Rfam's hand-curated motif models, we achieve high accuracy in both membership prediction and base-pair-level secondary structure prediction (at least 75% average sensitivity and specificity on both tasks). Of the ncRNA candidates not in Rfam, we find compelling evidence that some of them are functional, and analyze several potential ribosomal protein leaders in depth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
France 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Poland 2 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 125 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 19%
Computer Science 12 8%
Chemistry 6 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 15 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,295
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,901
of 78,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.