↓ Skip to main content

Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Published in
Neurology, April 2013
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318292a342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Harris, Claire Gall, Jennifer C. Thompson, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones, Harris JM, Gall C, Thompson JC, Richardson AM, Neary D, du Plessis D, Pal P, Mann DM, Snowden JS, Jones M, J. M. Harris, C. Gall, J. C. Thompson, A. M. T. Richardson, D. Neary, D. du Plessis, P. Pal, D. M. A. Mann, J. S. Snowden, M. Jones

Abstract

We aimed to assess sensitivity and specificity of the updated criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) based on a large autopsy-confirmed cohort of patients with dementia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Other 23 27%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Neuroscience 18 21%
Psychology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Linguistics 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,280,686
of 17,359,532 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#6,471
of 16,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,265
of 162,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#48
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,359,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.