↓ Skip to main content

Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Published in
Neurology, April 2013
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318292a342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Harris, Claire Gall, Jennifer C. Thompson, Anna M.T. Richardson, David Neary, Daniel du Plessis, Piyali Pal, David M.A. Mann, Julie S. Snowden, Matthew Jones, Harris JM, Gall C, Thompson JC, Richardson AM, Neary D, du Plessis D, Pal P, Mann DM, Snowden JS, Jones M, J. M. Harris, C. Gall, J. C. Thompson, A. M. T. Richardson, D. Neary, D. du Plessis, P. Pal, D. M. A. Mann, J. S. Snowden, M. Jones

Abstract

We aimed to assess sensitivity and specificity of the updated criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) based on a large autopsy-confirmed cohort of patients with dementia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Other 24 30%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 33%
Neuroscience 18 22%
Psychology 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,521,353
of 15,782,442 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#10,296
of 15,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,110
of 156,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#51
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,782,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.