You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early Epidemiological Assessment of the Virulence of Emerging Infectious Diseases: A Case Study of an Influenza Pandemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006852 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroshi Nishiura, Don Klinkenberg, Mick Roberts, Johan A. P. Heesterbeek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 119 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 21% |
Mathematics | 9 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 27 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,815,659
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,476
of 194,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,802
of 91,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#115
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.