↓ Skip to main content

Hyperpycnal plume‐derived fans in the Santa Barbara Channel, California

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperpycnal plume‐derived fans in the Santa Barbara Channel, California
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/grl.50488
Authors

Jonathan A. Warrick, Alexander R. Simms, Andy Ritchie, Elisabeth Steel, Pete Dartnell, James E. Conrad, David P. Finlayson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 41%
Engineering 2 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,801,619
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#14,700
of 20,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,485
of 198,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#180
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.