↓ Skip to main content

Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
631 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001936.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moises A Calderon, Bernadette Alves, Mikila Jacobson, Brian Hurwitz, Aziz Sheikh, Stephen Durham

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis is the most common of the allergic diseases. Despite improved understanding of the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis and advances in its pharmacological treatment, its prevalence has increased worldwide. For patients whose symptoms remain uncontrolled despite medical treatment, allergen injection immunotherapy is advised. An allergen-based treatment may reduce symptoms, the need for medication and modify the natural course of this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 270 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 36 13%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 7%
Other 67 24%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Unspecified 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,252,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,647
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,566
of 173,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.