↓ Skip to main content

WRITING INTELLIGIBLE ENGLISH PROSE FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WRITING INTELLIGIBLE ENGLISH PROSE FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, April 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04603.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Ludbrook

Abstract

1. I present a combination of semi-objective and subjective evidence that the quality of English prose in biomedical scientific writing is deteriorating. 2. I consider seven possible strategies for reversing this apparent trend. These refer to a greater emphasis on good writing by students in schools and by university students, consulting books on science writing, one-on-one mentoring, using 'scientific' measures to reveal lexical poverty, making use of freelance science editors and encouraging the editors of biomedical journals to pay more attention to the problem. 3. I conclude that a fruitful, long-term, strategy would be to encourage more biomedical scientists to embark on a career in science editing. This strategy requires a complementary initiative on the part of biomedical research institutions and universities to employ qualified science editors. 4. An immediately realisable strategy is to encourage postgraduate students in the biomedical sciences to undertake the service courses provided by many universities on writing English prose in general and scientific prose in particular. This strategy would require that heads of departments and supervisors urge their postgraduate students to attend such courses. 5. Two major publishers of biomedical journals, Blackwell Publications and Elsevier Science, now provide lists of commercial editing services on their web sites. I strongly recommend that authors intending to submit manuscripts to their journals (including Blackwell's Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology) make use of these services. This recommendation applies especially to those for whom English is a second language.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 4 3%
Brazil 4 3%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 99 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 21%
Researcher 19 16%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Other 33 28%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Arts and Humanities 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Linguistics 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 33 28%
Unknown 9 8%